katalog promosi

[translated by google translate] [tsiyon truth point tsiyon.org] [tsiyon] [presents] ["prince andy and the pedophile"] ["hillary complicit in rape cover-up claims bill is accuser"] ["did you just say jeffrey epstein?"] ["hillary hiding bill's sex crimes"] [child sex trafficking of the elite]

["what cosby's hiding"] ["hand-picked child sex slaves for jeff epstein, now she is funded by the clinton foundation"] [voice of eliyahu ben david] tonight we are going to be talking about a very serious subject, and it has to do with sexual abuse of children. nobody really wants to hear about that, nobody really wants to talk about that, and yet there is really such a big problem that we need to be aware of it. so, i just want to mention to parents, if you have children you need to decide whether you want them to hear this information or not and i leave that to your discretion. romans chapter 16:18 sums up

i think, pretty well, the situation with those who are causing this problem on a global scale. paul wrote "for suck people are slaves.. of their own appetites; and by their smooth and flattering speech they deceive the hearts of the innocent." here is the statistics. myself, i believe that when you go by reports of things like this, reports are going to be far less than actual cases. however, the statistics are that 1 in 6 boys will experience, or does experience, some form of sexual abuse

and 1 in 4 girls, as children, experience some form of sexual abuse. now, as i say, i believe those numbers are probably very conservative and the case is worse, but let us say it is not worse than this. we are talking about 2 children out of every 10 children, can we really afford to have that incidence of sexual abuse in our society? how destructive really is that to the lives, not only of those particular children, but what about the lives of other people around them?

but what is responsible for this? now here is something that nobody wants you to know, nobody wants to talk about it, because it makes people feel bad. it might make you feel bad to hear about it. i am not talking about it to make you feel bad, i am talking about it because the sexual revolution changed the way that we look at marriage, that we look at families, whereas the majority of couples used to stay married. that has just gone by the wayside.

you today would have a better chance of crossing the grand canyon without a net, without any assistance, over a tightrope than getting married on your first marriage and making it all the way to the end. because the presssures are really that great today, things have changed that much. but what is the difference? what they want you to believe is, it is better now because now you have more freedom, you can be happier.

however, what about the children? this study here shows that, oh and by the way what happens to the children depends mostly on the mother. it is just a fact. with a kind of family i was talking about there was a mother with her children. mothers cannot do that anymore, most of them cannot. they have to work, that is the way the economy is structured now, the economy has changed in order to accomodate these social changes. so, this is not meant to criticize anyone, what they are doing, i understand

you know you have to do what you need to do to support your family but nevertheless as soon as the nuclear family broke up it caused a much greater incidence of abuse of all kinds and the worst possible situation is a biological mother who is cohabiting with someone other than her husband. that situation puts her children at risk 33 times greater than the two biological parents together in the nuclear family. 33 times greater. well,

how many people does that apply to today? there are probably at least just as many people living together as are married today. so, you can just imagine the scope of the problem and how much worse it really is now than it would be under a traditional kind of home. now, yes, there was, and is, sexual abuse in those kind of homes. but the statistics prove it was and is far less than what is happening under this very liberalized idea of how people should live.

well, who is doing this? who is abusing these children? again, looking at the statistics, the statistics show that it is most likely to be either a family member or an acquaintance. and least likely to be a stranger. so that is what the picture is. now you might think 'okay, well i would recognize someone who is a bad person.' but you know, you might not because

according to the statistics, 63% of those who are perpetrators have no criminal history. they are not known to be abusers. that is 2/3 of the perpetrators. so, that means that if someone has designs on abusing your child, it is probably somebody that you know and would not suspect. now i find that frightening as a parent. this is like one of the scariest things of all, so,

you see, when you think about that and then you think about the changes in the families and moms not being home with their kids anymore, and all of that, you can really see how all of this has come together in such a way as to put this tremendous burden on the children. that is where it is all falling. so what can we do about this? well there is a number of things, spiritual things, we could talk about but the very first thing is, you have to be aware. you have to know what to look for, we do not want to be looking at our family members,

at our friends, as if they are some kind of a pervert when they are not. that is kind of not going to go over well and that will certainly destroy your friendships. but at the same time, there are signs if you look for them and parenting.com lays out some things to look for. later you might look at this list and think about it a little bit more, but things like a person, an adult who, prefers spending most of his or her time with children instead of adults. now some people have to do that because of circumstances -

we are not talking about that. we are talking about someone who seems to always be gravitating towards the children when they do not have to. another sign is a person that allows children to do things their parents do not let them do. that is a tip-off right there. someone who makes fun of children''s body parts, or describes children with sexual words such as 'stud' or 'sexy' or words like this. this is not a way for an adult to be talking about a child and this is a tip-off. any adult who seems obsessed with the sexual activities of kids or teens

could possibly be someone who would be a problem. someone who asks their adult partner to dress or act like a child or teen. of course, an adult that looks at child pornography. now, if somebody is doing that, you are probably not going to know, but you might catch them at it. that would be a tip-off. someone who generally seems sexually obsessed is someone who is potentially harmful to your children. lastly, someone who has put themselves in a position of dealing with children. such as a coach, a teacher, or a counselor, and has some of these other markers as well.

this is something that happens, you know those people that who are abusers, they are looking to put themselves in a situation where they have that access. well, that is really all i am going to say about those people who maybe around us in every day life, around our children, who could be a danger to our children. but what do you do if you actually identify somebody as being an abuser of your children? well, you might think 'okay well i will call the authorities.' i am not telling you whether you should or should not, you are going to have to decide that, but the truth is, there is a big problem with that too. i found this statistic in this book.

"more than 1 in 5 children in foster care develop ptsd as a result of physical and/or sexual abuse." in other words, when the state takes children away from their parents and puts them in a foster home, 1 in 5 is not only abused, but is abused so bad they develop ptsd. that is a serious condition and it often last throughout a persons life. post-traumatic stress disorder. re-living the events over and over again like some kind of a horrible nightmare that will not go away.

foster care, the state, is doing this to so many children. in some cases the kids are in a situation where nobody listens to them, they do not get the help they need or if they do talk about it, they end up in a home where things are worse than they were. or they do not talk about it until they are an adult. then finally they are ready to be able to deal with it, and to expose the abusers. except that

in many places, the law prevents that from happening. so you grow up, you want to press charges, you want to sue that person so that someone else is not abused by them. but, if you say anything about them in many places, what you will find out is, you yourself will be sued. that it is against the law. so that is a pretty horrible situation, now, i did not know that until i looked it up, but i am pretty sure abusers know that.

they are counting on laws like this, in fact, they are behind them. now we are going to talk about homosexual child abusers. what you are going to hear about this in the mainstream press, what gets repeated over and over again, is that homosexuals are not abusers anymore than heterosexuals. yet, the information has been around for years

showing exactly the opposite to that. for instance, in one book it days 'pedophilia appears to have a greater than chance association... with homosexuality.' another book says 'around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys. thus the rate of homosexual attraction is 620 times higher among pedophiles." in a 1988 study of 229 convicted felons who were child molesters, 86% of them described themselves as gay or bisexual." so there is lots of evidence suggesting that there is a higher chance of people who are homosexual

being pedophiles as well. we have seen this, in the news, perhaps you remember jerry sandusky, who was in the news. perfect example of how this works, he would put himself in a position as a coach where he had access to his victims. there are so many people like him who have not been caught or who are protected he happens to be someone that did get caught and was prosecuted. here also is an article about foster care.

gay abusive children in foster care. many other examples could be cited, here is another one. recently, elijah wood came out and exposed child abuse, sexual child abuse, in hollywood. saying "there are a lot of vipers in this industry." he is not the only one, there have been others who have even come out and stated that they have been abused, many of the child stars that you might have known in television shows, in the movies, have been in this position. so when you have this kind of situation and in many cases this is actually homosexual abuse,

something like this is alarming. the boy scouts ending their ban on gay leaders. now they were pushed to the wall and made to do this. for...ever, since the boyscouts existed, they had a ban on homosexual leaders. why? they wanted to protect boys, it is the boyscouts right? but these are the times we are living in friends. where what matters is how the perverts feel, not the protection of our kids. that is where things have gone, that is what the law is becoming more and more.

protecting the perpetrators and making it easier to violate our children. i am not just blowing smoke. when you look at the facts, it is so alarming. let us talk about access to your children. these people have more access to your children than ever before. now we have talked somewhat about direct access right? that they put themselves at a place sometimes where they have direct access. but now we are talking about something else, another kind of access, which is through

technology. especially the internet. this is getting to be incredibly huge problem. the queensland organized crime commission of inquiry wrote about this, this is in australia. basically, all of the developed countries are having the same situation. they concluded an alarming demand for increasingly depraved material, increasing the demand for child victims. you know, when i read that just the way that is put was so shocking it almost knocked me off my feet.

just thinking in terms of demand for child victims, can you think about that? i mean, demand, i can think about demand for tomatoes or for spaghetti. but i cannot really think about demand for child victims. yet that is what they found. an alarming demand for increasingly depraved material. so, the demand is greater and what they want is worse than what they have got. i really do not want to know what that is.

but i know it must be pretty horrible. now here is something you can look for i found these images online, the fbi put this out. these are symbols that child abusers use among themselves, to identify themselves, as to who they are. so, you know, you or i we might just think that is a pretty little butterfly, we do not know what that means when we see it on somebodies website.

but, what it means is pretty horrendous, that is true with all of these things, so, that is something we can watch for when we are on the internet, that if you see any of these symbols you know that there are people there who are child abusers. this is of course a huge problem. child pornography and the internet.

those two things are just a lethal mix together because those people are into that, they know where to find that on the internet and they just feed the sickness that they have, they just feed it. of course it becomes worse and worse. will they act it out? almost all of the sexual abusers, that are arrested, admit to this. so obviously it is having a big effect. here is something that happened here in texas.

sting operations, i am so glad these are going on. alleged perverts, who surf social media websites in search of vulnerable children for sex. now, parents, you know this is the 22st century right? a lot of our kids, they have access to the internet and a lot of times we do not think anything about it. you have to realize what a dangerous place that really is. you know, some of these kids they get hooked up with people like this and you never see them again.

that happens a lot. all i would say about that is take reasonable precautions, there is software you can get for your younger children, in order to control where they go on the internet. put some thought into this to protect your children, because there is some really bad people out there. it gets pretty horrible when you put the internet together with this. that is trafficking of children. listen to this quote. "what we do see is that the trafficking of children is becoming an

income revenue stream for organized crime, for gangs. so where they would typically be selling guns and drugs, they are now turning to selling of children." you know, a lot of us, we would not even know about that whole world, right? we would not know that exist. what they are trying to tell us here is that it is the profit motive that is really driving this. that gangs, organized crime, is behind this trafficking in children, they need children in order to produce all of this slime that they put out over the internet. some of those same people pay them

to do horrible things with those same kids. they always want new faces. this is just causing this problem of trafficking children to hyper-expand. it is happening at such a huge rate, it is just amazing. then i think a lot of us have seen this in the news. this is isis, there are other groups like isis, terrorist groups, aberrant groups, who take children and women,

and girls, as slaves. they sell them in sex trafficking operations. this is very huge, who are they looking for? well, according to this source they are looking for blue eyed children. this happening to any child is a horrible thing. but you know, some people who have blue eyed children

many of them, they are the some of the people who are on the left, who are kind of supporting these radical groups and so on. i wonder what they would think if they realized that their children were considered prime property to these very people that they like to protect. these children are abducted by isis fighters to be used for sexual slavery. now, in the past, sometimes i have talked about slavery and the fact that we are still slaves, in the system. you know, you are a slave to the system.

you do not have anything to say about it, you have to pay in to the irs, you in so many ways are enslaved by the system. but the kind of slavery i am talking about is not that. i am talking about the old fashioned kind of slavery with chains, where somebody owns you and you do not have a life of your own, that kind of slavery. that kind of slavery, not only exist today, but there are more of those slaves today, right now, than at any time in history.

the people they want more than anybody else are children. there are people likely in your neighborhood, that are scoping out your neighborhood, trying to find vulnerable children that they can snatch. 20.9 million victims of human trafficking worldwide. this is such a gigantic problem! you know if the appetite had not been created for this through decades of sexual propaganda, telling these perverts that they were born that way and they cannot help it,

would you have a problem of that size? they created these people that are doing this, that is what happened. 5.5 million children, according to this, 53% are taken for sexual exploitation. some are taken for organ removal. it gets that bad. this includes the united states. look at some of the leading cities where this is such a big problem. now here is stuff you would never know unless you read it, a pimp can make

150-200,000 dollars each year, per girl. the average pimp has 4-6 girls. 9.5 billion annually in human trafficking in the united states. approxiamately 300,000 children are at risk of being prostituted in the united states according to this. here is an amazing thing, 1/3 of teens on the street will be lured toward prostitution within 48-hours of leaving home,

all they have to do is be on the street and these people will know it and they are after them. now here is an interesting statistic. 74% of these likely sex-trafficking victims were in the care of social services or foster care when they went missing. what kind of job is the government doing dealing with kids, protecting kids? this is where so many of them are ending up. this whole idea of trafficking in children is so outrageous and you know if you were born in america, you probably think of that as some kind of a third world problem. you do not really think of that as an american problem but

wake up! things have changed. this is a huge problem. if you have children, you need to realize there is people out there who want to exploit them. who have an incentive, a financial incentive, to exploit them. you need to be aware of it, because this is vastly growing. children have become a commodity. their parents need to jealously guard their little ones. vip abusers.

this is what is driving a lot of the problem, frankly. elite vip people. i mentioned about hollywood. corey feldman came out recently and he admitted that he himself, as a child actor, was sexually abused. he says he would love to name names but he says "unfortunately california, conveniently enough, has a statue of limitations that prevents that from happening. because if i were to go and mention anybody's name i would be the one that would be in legal problems

and i am the one that would be sued." this is all set up to protect hollywood from these charges coming forward. hollywood is a big center of industry in california. they have a lot of influence, obviously, they have a lot of influence on the law, plus it is a very liberal kind of place where hey, everybody there thinks everyone is born that way, right? so there is no protection for the children. that is the bottom line, over and over again, that is the bottom line.

famous people. you know what? we know about famous people that are out there walking the streets, right? right now, who are sexual abusers. some of the magazines, they follow those people around. why are they not behind bars? in the united kingdom there was recently five pedophile rings that were exposed in secret dossiers, so i cannot tell you who these people were. i can tell you that twenty-four are currently serving in the government.

we know that much. there is murders connected with this, it is a really nasty deal. "judge vows to uncover truth from corridors of power to children's homes. vip sex abusers will be named." well it turns out they will not be named. in australia an investigation turned up 26 insitutions involved in abuse of children, involving vip's. "in australia, the high-profiled sexual abusers, child molesters, rapists, pedophiles, are very well protected.

the freemasons and many other such organizations...all protected by the powerful of our country. we have powerful businessmen and others involved in sex trafficking, girls from europe, south africa, china. details were given to the prime ministers office tony abbott, none of these men have been brought to justice. the powerful, the elite, can do what ever they want, because they know they have protection." this is what is happening. the elite perverts can do whatever they want because they think they own you, they think they own your children, and the government is not giving them any reason to think anything different.

here is an interesting article. 'how this billionaire escaped sex trafficking charges' now this was in the news, jeffrey epstein. billionaire friends with royalty, friends with the clinton's, and a lot of other famous people. the man had an island, his own island, where he was sex trafficking. bringing underage children there and then bringing in the wealthy elite to come and have big parties abusing the children. well, thankfully they found out about it and he is going to be in prison the rest of his life. not!

you know what happened with him? thirteen months in the country jail in florida. even there, he was allowed to visit his office everyday and a cushy one year house arrest. as i mentioned, his friends, bill clinton, prince andrew, and many others, arranged for him to have special treatment from the state attorney's office, and the u.s. department of injustice. oh, that is supposed to be justice. i cannot say that about them.

"his team of lawyers is accused of digging up dirt on epstein's roughly 40 victims, following them and intimidating them. they have now effectively been silenced, many with one-million dollar settlements. epstein was allowed to plead guilty to 2 lower level state crimes rather than face child sex trafficking charges." what do you think that he is just going to be doing this some more? maybe he is doing it right now. after all, he has got lots of customers among all of the elite. including, apparently, this guy. his name was found twenty-one times in jeffrey epstein's directory

to go out to his private island where the abuse of children seemed to be what it was all about. these are just a few things, you know if i went into all of these different cases, having to do with the elite, my whole message would be about that. really, that is true with any aspect here. it is huge, but you can see where the elite are really behind, driving, a lot of this trafficking in children. well, now that we want to get back to what is at the root of all of this. the 'born this way' deception. i have taught you this in the past.

in "psychology today" it said: "no one has yet identified a particular gay gene." it is known that there is no gay gene. here is a little more about that from the washington times. the headline "born gay or transgender - little evidence to support innate trait" little is too much, there is no evidence actually. that is what they said - no evidence. 143 page paper, put together by experts in the field, who literally comb through all the information available, to come to that conclusion.

in the report they say: "the belief that sexual orientation is an innate, biologically fixed human property - that people are 'born that way' - is not support by scientific evidence." yet, almost everybody thinks that is how it is. "likewise, the belief that gender identity is an innate, fixed human property independent of biological sex - so that a person might be a 'man trapped in a woman's body' or a 'woman trapped in a man's body' - is not supported by scientific evidence," the report states. "the authors also say there is scarce evidence to suggest that sex reassignment

medically benefits patients - one reason that dr. mchugh in his capacity as pyschiatrist in chief at johns hopkins hospital, ended the practice in the 70's." they ended sex reassignment surgery at johns hopkins hospital in the 70's. they knew way back then that this was not helpful to people and was even harmful to people so much so they ended it. now

the obama administration is pushing to get this into every hospital in the country. can you imagine? they mentioned children as young as 2 years old being recommended for sex reassignment. there is not even any evidence that this is any kind of a treatment, anything other than abuse of those children. it is outrageous, you know what? craziness and stupidity and propaganda has horrible effects on people. we need to know the truth. that is what everybody needs.

well, here is a gentleman, oklahoma state senator joseph silk. he wanted to allow people businesses, to decide who they want to serve. it is their business, they own the business, they want to be able to decide who they serve int heir business. the lgbt activist did not like that and issues death threats against the mans children and family. because of introducing this bill. this is what you are dealing with, with this.

interestingly, it seems like the system speaking, the federal government, seems to support these radicals instead of supporting the ordinary people, their families, and their children. why is that happening? this is even happening in school. i think we pretty much all know that the teachers union is very left-leaning and teachers,

not all teachers, but many of them think of themselves as progressive or liberals. but really, some of what is out there is kind of beyond the pale at this point, and is shocking to me even knowing those facts. this is the website of the national council of teachers of english. now how bad could it be from the english teachers of america, right? when you think about an english teacher you think of some bespectacled librarian-type person, do you not? how could this person possibly be a danger to your children?

well, guess again. this is about diverse gender expression and gender non-conformity curriculum in english grades 7-12. here is some of the things that have been written. they produced a guide for english teachers suggesting that they make english more 'gay-friendly'. now let me quote what they say here: "position your students as lgbt people or their straight allies." they start out with this, actually assuming, their students are either

part of this lgbt community, which is less than 3% of the population, or one of their allies. that is the way they are coming at it. they go on: "they are likely being positioned as straight and/or homophobic in most other parts of their lives." yes, their parents. you know, their 'dumb' parents at home are telling them that they are going to grow up and get married to a woman, if a man, or vice versa, and have a family together. that is homophobic, you cannot be saying that to your kids.

instead you have to let them know that they can be part of this deviant community. well also, besides positioning them as homophobic, or as non-homophobic, or whatever, they go on to say "read lgbt-themed literature that does not just make homosexuality visible, but also shows queer people in queer communities; young people need to know that being gay does not mean being alone." so in other words, they want to indoctrinate them 'if you become gay, you are going to have a lot of cool friends that are gay too.'

this is like, to me, this is like a sales pitch for the kids. selling them on being part of the lgbt community. you know what? if your teacher is selling you on this, that this is such a good thing, how many of these kids are going to get misdirected into something that really is not them at all. "classrooms are typically set up to reflect sustaining 'hetero-normativity'." i have to tell you, i favor hetero-normativity. okay? i am one of those people that they do not like, apparently. they say "we hope to encourage a continued, fluid recognition of 'gender' as something that is complex,"

and so on. they also say "hetero-sexism", see, i am a heterosexist in their view. "and homophobia, are already part of the classroom," i may be a heterosexist but i am not a homophobe. i am not afraid of those people. that is what homophobia means, you are afraid of them. no, i am not afraid of them. i just think that they have chosen the wrong thing and they are trying to get other people to choose it too.

that, i am opposed to. so anyway, they are saying "hetero-sexism and homophobia are already part of the classroom, so we will need to use a variety of strategies to counter these beliefs." now think about that. are they really thinking about the classroom or are they thinking about the children's parents here? they are countering beliefs, what kind of beliefs do you think they are countering? do you think maybe people that believe in the bible is what they are trying to counter, but they cannot say that in their journal?

we are really not as dumb as they think we are, we can really understand what they are saying. here is their summary. "by learning to read through a gendered lens and by posing challenges to the gender binary," the gender binary is male and female, which happens to be the biological binary. by challenging that "students become consciously aware of gendered constructions of identity and their role as both consumers and possible producers of meaning. this act is potentially liberating for students,"

what are they trying to do? they are indoctrinating children in this lgbt philosophy, they want to 'liberate' them from their heterosexual beliefs. are they not trying to convert these kids into lgbt people? is that not what they want? i put these notes here: the overall goal is clearly to encourage students to question their beliefs on gender - particularly boy, girl "binary" gender roles - and to embrace lgbtq, gender fluid thinking.

i put: it is not hard to envision the harm this will cause! can you imagine this? children, all over the country becoming confused about their gender. or in some cases thinking that maybe they will be more cool if they are part of this new cool community, the lgbtq community. you know, maybe their life is real sucky, in their language, and they want to do something to change their life, so they listen to all of this nonsense, then pretty soon they find themselves in a hospital undergoing

a sex-change operation. how many kids are going to have this happen to them because of these teachers? can you imagine it? what about this problem? could this be connected? this is a website i found online: 'bad bad teachers' is the name of it. probably you have noticed in the news, there is a continual string of, specifically, female teachers who are sexually abusing their students.

have you seen that? this website list many of them and tells about their cases, this is like a hugely growing phenomenon that is happening right now. do you think this could be happening because the teachers themselves are being indoctrinated that they are born that way and everything sexual is okay! i mean, we just read it, is that not propaganda that they are putting forward to the teachers? why would we not think that a lot of those teachers, who are women, would not be affected by that?

you think they are just going to limit that to some kind of a black and white text book. these things have a way of taking on a life of their own and apparently have in the lives of a lot of people, a lot of teachers. so what happens when a female teacher abuses her male students? well in many cases, not much happens. they might lose their job

but in many cases they do not even have any jail time. we have one person here that had a sentence of a year in jail, so probably did less than that, if any. two that had no jail time at all, i did not go through all of them. but that seems to be the trend. so here we have people to whom we have entrusted our precious children. they have violated that trust, they have used their position of authority in the lives of these children to abuse them.

what happens with them? they get a little slap on the wrist, they do not even get jail time for doing what they are doing, what is the message that that is sending to the children? what are we really telling these children? are we not telling them as a society, they do not really matter all that much? that it cannot really be wrong and you know what? eventually society will catch up with the 'cool' people and understand that this is all 'okay'. that is what they are thinking, that is what a lot of them are thinking. you know on this website,

there is comments. basically i just summed up the comments for you, that is what a lot of people are thinking. [with: eliyahu ben david] [this video has been produced by: the tsiyon team] [visit us online: www.tsiyon.org] [watch us on youtube: www.youtube.com/tsiyontabernacle] [fair use notice] [copyright 2016 tsiyon.org]